Vital Football

Latest Tottenham Hotspur News

Van Bommel in, Palacios out?

Van Bommel in, Palacios out?

It has been suggested that Bayern Munich midfielder Mark Van Bommel, could be a target for Tottenham, either in January or the summer.

33 year old Van Bommel is out of contract in the summer and although Bayern are looking to extend his stay at the club, the opportunity to play in the Premiership, even for a short period could appeal to the Dutchman.

The benefits of signing Van Bommel are that not only could he be a cheap or free transfer, but he would offer genuine experience and leadership to the side and could be an ideal tutor for our new superstar, Sandro, not forgetting he could be ideal company for the great Rafael van der Vaart.

Should a deal be made, it would surely spell the end for Wilson Palacios at Spurs, and based on recent games, it is already quite possible that our Brazilian has leapfrogged our Honduran as our first choice ball winner, but in the short term a player of Van Bommel`s pedigree could be a great asset, whilst also allowing us to cash in on Palacios and use that money to bring in players elsewhere in the squad.

Harry won`t worry about the players age and would welcome his experience and as we have seen with his bringing in William Gallas and trying to sign Patrick Vieira, if the player offers enough positives, he won`t worry about the date on his birth certificate...

Win FREE pizza with Vital Football!
Select your team and get 50% off if they score twice.

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Date:Sunday October 24 2010
Time: 9:00PM

Best of Vital Network

Vital Boxing - Haye’s Blast


The worlds biggest thug? No thanks.
24/10/2010 21:02:00
Wilson will come good still young enough to learn!
24/10/2010 21:10:00
I don't think it's the end of Palacios yet. He actually looked decent when he came on against Inter (despite managing to pick up a booking having only been on the pitch for 10 mins!), and same against Everton. The reason he was subbed is the same reason Sandro was subbed at HT against Fulham - he was on a yellow and was probably one tackle from being sent off. And in fairness to him the booking wasn't even his fault was a mistake by Hutton that led to the incident. Anyway, much like how Lennon seems to have recovered from a loss of form by being dropped to the bench for a few games, I believe a similar thing could happen with Palacios. And as for Van Bommel - would rather keep Palacios, MVB is a thug and we don't have to resort to that kind of football with midfielders like Modric, VDV, Lennon and Bale.
24/10/2010 21:10:00
Wilson is poor, but I'd never replace him with van Bommel. The guy is just a thuggish cheat that should not be allowed on the pitch. Horrible player.
24/10/2010 21:17:00
Harry would have to make sure he could lob it up to crouch from 80 yards before signing him
matt hoten
24/10/2010 21:18:00
Van Bommel? No because we have Palacios. Why would we reject him before he's reached his full maturity? What's the matter, is he suddenly not good enough? What about Sandro? No, no, no, no. We cannot keep spending like this at any rate, and definately not on players when are well stocked in those areas. What about Sandro, I repeat? No to Van Bommel. He's bloody ancient, could have come years ago, and has now missed the boat.
Tony Rocky Horror
24/10/2010 21:45:00
I know i`m on my own but is Sandro set to replace Hudd ?.Hudd is the best paaser in EPL no question but he`s slow & he does not protect the back four well enough ,but Sandro i see him & Modric running things with V.D.V just in front & Bale & Lennon on the wings .I`m very impressed with Sandro & for me it should soon be Hudd out Sandro in
big cockeral
24/10/2010 21:52:00
Does this story really make sense? Palacios is 26, already at the club and familiar with the Premiership whereas van Bommel is 33, and at the tail end of an illustrious career. Spurs have Sandro and the possibility of getting Muntari so why bother for a player next summer will be 34.
24/10/2010 21:54:00
Wilso will recover his form right now in traning he is getting hios passing game sorted and believe you me in the next few weeks we will see a resurgent seargant and with Sandro via for a start it's just what we require. VB no chance.
Horny Helen
24/10/2010 22:33:00
For the most part, I agree with the second post from 'big cockeral', about the possibility of Sandro replacing Huddlestone. However, if the price was right, I would definitely bring in Van Bommel. There's no guarantee that Palacios will regain and maintain his form of old, and if Sandro picks up an injury, we do not have another capable defensive midfielder, and please don't mention Huddlestone here, as he can't tackle. Sure, Huddlestone is a great passer (most of the time), but a tough-tackling midfielder he is not... As well as being a hard man, or a 'thug' as some of you call him, Van Bommel would also bring much-needed leadership skills to the team and if there is any truth to this article, then I hope we sign him in January, along with a world-class striker.
Dean in Brum
24/10/2010 23:43:00
A few years ago (before we had even heard of Palacios) there was talk of our trying to get Van Bommel. We could have done with him then but not now. He is 33 for chrissake, don't we have enough has-beens already and more than enough midfielders. As everyone is saying we need a top striker and a central defender NOT another MF.
24/10/2010 23:46:00
no thank you....sandros the real deal
24/10/2010 23:55:00
re: Harry would have to make sure he could lob it up to crouch from 80 yards before signing him ... HA! I would be laughing out loud, if this were not so eerily close to the truth!!!
25/10/2010 01:03:00
Van Bommel is 2-3 years past his best. He would not be able to cope with the pace of the premiership and be a liability. Rather spend the money trying for Diarra, Muntari or Veloso. Wilson is not going to take us any further. We need to be looking to improve in any position we replace. Diarra, Dzeko and a central defender is needed.
25/10/2010 01:24:00
Always solve the problem at hand. Dont go looking for a solution, if there is no problem in first place.Our worry is not tackling midfielders. Need of the hour is i)strikers, one world class & other good second forward. ii)Injury free good center back Get the follwoing people we would get top4 for sure. Following are the prospects according to me. Sellling list: i) Keane ii) Gio iii) Bentley iv) O Hara v) Crouch Buyling list i) Luis Suarez. He could be 30m. Break the bank for him. He is value for money. He is young,even if he there in club for 3-4 yeras, he still will be 26-27. ii) Edin Dzeko. iii) Lukaku iv) Hulk from Porto v)Connor Wickham vi)Ricky van Wolfswinkel Defense. I see follwoing 3 as good prospects. Gary Cahill,Phil Jones, Craig Cathcart. Cahill may be 15m, Jones 10m and Cathcart from blackpool could be got for good value as well.
25/10/2010 01:59:00
No need for Van Bommel. With Hudd, Modric, Sandro, Livermore we have 4 guys for 2 spots for the next 7-10 years. Palacios is running out of time to find his game and he has already pushed Jenas back in to the picture. Who'd a thunk it? COYS
25/10/2010 03:06:00
What sort of leadership would be provided by an aged thug?
spurs in brasil
25/10/2010 04:14:00
I've said on other posts recently that Sandro has a huge presence when he's on the pitch. You really notice him. He's ready NOW. He should be starting NOW. He'll pick up plenty of bookings, but he is the enforcer we need, and already have. Not Van Bommel.
25/10/2010 05:07:00
Sandro is already showing a confidence and strength that belies his inexperience in the Prem.
25/10/2010 05:14:00
No thank you, free transfer or not he will want obscene wages to play here.
25/10/2010 07:21:00
From what I have seen of Sandro so far I believe he is more than capable of being our long term tackling CM. Forward, LB and CB should be our priority.
Officer X
25/10/2010 07:31:00
Would like Van Bommel, he could help Sandro with his game whilst allowing us to get some money together from the sale of Palacios to spend on a decent striker ! Unfortunetely after the performance Fabiano put in last night pretty sure he'll be staying where his is
25/10/2010 08:48:00
Van Bommell couldn't deal with the pace of the Premiership in the middle. I remember feeling sorry for Davids after his legs had gone and players with half his ability were getting the better of him. Van Bommell wouldn't help us progress as a club.
25/10/2010 08:57:00
as for mvb, why do or would we need him? we have more than enough class midfielders, christ, even jenas is starting to look decent and i loathe the guy.
25/10/2010 09:36:00
Buy thug of the year.....I don't think so.
25/10/2010 09:37:00
Don't want him. Don't need him. If Sandro continues to progress we could ship Palacios and not replace him. We'd still have Hudd, Sandro, Jenas & O'Hara as more defensive CMs. Could ship O'Hara too and still no stress.
25/10/2010 09:58:00
sydqcb5 - i'd love to see ricky van wolfswinkel sign just so i can get his name on the back of my shirt!
25/10/2010 12:46:00
KB71 is correct on all points. see above posts.
25/10/2010 13:47:00
Not just me then who thought Sandro looks the business. He has a bright future at our club and I am looking forward to a point where he can play 90 mins! Wilson will be back I am sure as will Lennon. Wilson has had a lot on his plate with his brother etc so I think the press are too quick on getting him out of the club and I am sure we are not thinking about moving him on. He is Harrys signing after all.
25/10/2010 15:17:00
Edgar Davids Mark 2. Whatever happened to him?
25/10/2010 15:45:00
If Mark Van Bommel were to come in on a short term deal and on a wage that was respective of the rest of the squad then I think he'd be a tremendous addition. Yes he's dirty and yes he's 33 but how many of you were complaining that we were too soft and inexperienced against Inter first half? This guy wouldnt play every game but he'd play most away fixtures and he'd kick the opposition up and down the pitch, then walk away with a warning and 3 points. Tremendous talent. I definately wouldnt take him in place of Palacios though, I still feel the Honduran has the potential to be world class and with arguably the best Defensive Midfielder in the world right now helping him for 6mth-a year, he could get there.
25/10/2010 16:15:00
25/10/2010 18:28:00
Mmm let me think...Two Bad tempered Dutchman on the same pitch, Van Pummell and Van Der "dont get me started" Vaart Wilson P, all in the same match. Enough to give Harry a facial tick!
OyVeh Maria
25/10/2010 20:19:00
Wilson is poor even with a good 45 minutes he did the usual stupid crap he always does and picks up a yellow! We cannot have that because Wilson with a card is basically the most useless player on the pitch because then he can't tackle and is on the ropes of getting a red always. Van Bommel would be a useless pickup he is decent player but he is too old to even consider picking up. He has been awful and Bayern as of recent times so what is to suggest that he would even be worth picking up. We really don't need these kind of players in our squad to play good football....I can appreciate a tackle but when that is one of the only qualities you possess then....tough luck there is far more to football then the art of a tackle. Van Bommell is to old and Palacios is just not good enough...sorry but this isn't form its just simply we have upgraded players and now his technical abilities stick out more then anything.
25/10/2010 20:19:00
Page 1/1
  1. 1

Login to post a comment

Recent Spurs Articles

Summer Fun

Last summer we had a huge overhaul of the squad with a mass ejection of dead-weight and the recruiting of some young hungry players willing to work.

Tottenham - Champions League Opponents? (23/5/16)

With Tottenham being guaranteed a place in next season's Champions League Group Stage - who are the potential opponents?

When Does 2016/17 Start For Spurs (23/5/16)

With the curtain fully drawn on the 2015/16 season and only the Championship Play Off Final to go to complete next year's top flight teams, here's when the new season...

Utter Nonsense

Vital Legend, Coops, casts his beady eyes over the latest Spurs related nonsense (or is it...)

Archived Vital Spurs Articles

Vital Spurs articles from

Site Journalists

Editor email
no email

Current Poll (see more polls)

Final Position?
Suggested By: Vital Spurs
ScoopDragon Premier League Network Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
C Leicester City 38 23 12 3 81 32
2 Arsenal 38 20 11 7 71 29
3 Spurs 38 19 13 6 70 34
4 Man City 38 19 9 10 66 30
5 Man Utd 38 19 9 10 66 14
6 Southampton 38 18 9 11 63 18
7 West Ham 38 16 14 8 62 14
8 Liverpool 38 16 12 10 60 13
9 Stoke 38 14 9 15 51 -14
10 Chelsea 38 12 14 12 50 6
11 Everton 38 11 14 13 47 4
12 Swansea 38 12 11 15 47 -10
13 Watford 38 12 9 17 45 -10
14 WBA 38 10 13 15 43 -14
15 Crystal Palace 38 11 9 18 42 -12
16 AFC Bournemouth 38 11 9 18 42 -22
17 Sunderland 38 9 12 17 39 -14
R Newcastle 38 9 10 19 37 -21
R Norwich 38 9 7 22 34 -28
R Aston Villa 38 3 8 27 17 -49
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News

Recent Spurs Results (view all)

Vital Members League Table

2.Nick Real Deal194
4.Real Deal183
5.Big Chiv179