Writer: OxfordSpur 
Date:Wednesday July 25 2012
Time: 2:16PM
With the retirement of Ledley King, Andre Villas-Boas will need a new leader, and apparently Michael Dawson could be at the top of his list of options.
What will confuse many Tottenham fans, is that they expect to see Dawson struggle to command a regular starting place over Younes Kaboul and Jan Vertonghen, but is the new role being based upon a Club captain as opposed to a team leader, which can perhaps be rotated depending on who is playing, which the overall leadership in the dressing room, training pitch and for the media, more important than who is in charge on a Saturday (or whenever) afternoon?
If we look at other viable candidates, perhaps the same applies to many of them. Scott Parker, is currently injured and could be for the first month or so of the season, and even then, he might be facing a battle to play every game, with the likes of Sandro and several others probably fighting for two, maybe three places. Perhaps if AVB looks to bring in his former player Joao Moutinho, a player who knows his game and speaks his language, literally.
Others such as William Gallas will have the same problem, and of course both he and our No14 could be out of the club, so therefore out of contention. Of the others, I see Youness Kaboul as being next in line behind Dawson and Parker, though that may chance, once Jan Vertonghen (or Moutinho) beds himself in, but would it be sensible to promote a new boy over others in what is already a happy and well oiled dressing room? Rahael Van der Vaart might fancy the job and he has captaincy experience to compare with all the other candidates, but is his medium to long term Spurs career secure and does he have the selfless character that a manager wants?
As fans we have campaigned for rotation of the squad, and therefore perhaps a playing captain isn't the vital thing it once was. Many foreign manager don't actually like the old school 'pin them up against the wall' type of leader, preferring a more cultured approach, but also to maintain that greater control themselves. Today, having a club captain is as important for media events than to wear the armband on the pitch.
In the case of Dawson, he is clean cut, intelligent, seems to have the respect and popularity in the dressing room and despite not being seen as a definite starter, he remains a well liked player with the fans. Perhaps we will see Dawson get the nod for the official functions, but then have a pecking order along the lines of (2) Parker, (3) Kaboul, (4) VdV, (5) Vertonghen and so on. To some it might seem overly complicated, but I suppose it is only a problem is there is a divided or unhappy dressing room and based on that idea alone, going for a safe and popular pair of hands, is better than anything else and though I can see real merit in looking to Parker, I can also see a call for Dawson is a sensible longer term decision...
Baldini confirmed! (Wednesday June 19 2013)
It's probably Nonsense. (Wednesday June 19 2013)
Fixtures for next season! (Wednesday June 19 2013)
With friends like Madrid … (Tuesday June 18 2013)
Reality cheque!! (Tuesday June 18 2013)
Utter Nonsense (Monday June 17 2013)
Our midfield… (Monday June 17 2013)
WHO, WHERE and WHY?. (Sunday June 16 2013)
Adam Smith wants chance at Spurs or PL loan. (Saturday June 15 2013)
Musings of Nonsensical proportions. (Friday June 14 2013)
| 1. | 80deg16minW | 249 |
| 2. | Spursex | 222 |
| 3. | Real Deal | 159 |
| 4. | spurdon | 127 |
| 5. | coopsieyid | 122 |
| 6. | ScottDaYid | 88 |
| 7. | Spurfect11 | 77 |
| 8. | Kinygerbils | 71 |
| 9. | redbloodcell | 71 |
| 10. | ahx00 | 63 |
| Latest Results |
| Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
| 12. Newcastle | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13. Norwich | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14. Southampton | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15. Spurs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16. Stoke | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17. Sunderland | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18. Swansea | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| VMC's Man of the Season
» Man City : 20/06/2013 00:58:00
|
| Saints Season 2012/2013 Review - Right Back
» Southampton : 19/06/2013 22:15:00
|
| 2013/14 Fixtures: Sunderland Welcome Fulham
» Sunderland : 19/06/2013 21:40:00
|
| Britton: All Players Hope Laudrup Stays
» Swansea : 19/06/2013 21:04:00
|
| Hull City to start 2013/14 season at Chelsea
» Hull City : 19/06/2013 20:45:00
|
| Pardew - 'I Am Staying!'
» Newcastle : 19/06/2013 19:09:00
|
| If You Pray Hard Enough………..
» Chelsea : 19/06/2013 17:45:00
|
As for Bassong how is he still here?!
In my opinion, Dawson is an uninspired choice. He's been Vice captain for ages now and (discounting Defoe as he joined Pompey for a year) is our longest serving player...signing along with Huddlestone in January 2005. However, he's not a leader of men, in fact it's often been said that Dawson needs a leader playing alongside him. He's a great Centre Back certainly, quick and technically very good for a stopper and as good as anyone in the air but even then, will he start ahead of Vertonghen and Kaboul?
I can see only 3 choices. Brad Friedel, Scott Parker or Rafa Van Der Vaart. No one is more experienced than big Brad and if we fail to sign a new keeper, is the perfect choice for the 12/13 season in my book. Scotty Parker leaves every inch of himself on the pitch and even without the arm band, leads by example. He was also named England captain ealier this year. Rafa is more vocal and more experienced at the very top level than anyone in our squad, he's in an akwad position on the pitch to be captaining the side but we've seen Lampard and Gerard both do it successfully in the past.
Shouts for Vertonghen, Bale and Kaboul are too premature for me.
I love Dawson but kaboul gets my vote for captain ,with Sandro vice captain .I expect Sandro to play alot more than parker next season .
Parker looks like he`s been on the pi$$ all night & slept in a hedge .
Its OK to call someone on here a fecking (unt & give them dogs abuse on a personal level, but its not OK to say "1st, first," or any other derivation, should your post just happen to be at the top of the pile. The hypocrisy of this is breathtaking & we should all be angry about it.
I was accused of being over the top when I likened this censorship to the Stasi, but this proves that it was not an exaggeration. There was nothing in my post that could've be construed as mindless childishness & in fact the only childishness with today's actions is by Oxfordspur is his deletion of them. All this just to appease a couple of moaners with a sense of humour bypass who won't allow others to have a little bit of fun. Maybe its time to get another moderator, this ones getting too politically correct by allowing the minority view to over-ride that of the vast majority. That's not his job & he should remember that.
<>br>I will NOT be silenced in this way & you should ALL take note of what is happening to VS.
They should put him with the under 12`s
Whether its simple to avoid being deleted for it or not, thats not the point mate, its out of order to delete any of these sorts of posts whilst allowing high levels of personal abuse to go unchallenged by the site moderator. As I said, its hypocrisy, pure & simple.
Your argument about AVB will stand up if you believe that Spurs should have given the £15 million long term contract Harry Redknapp was after .
There was no middle ground ,sack him or give him a long term deal putting him on a wage par with ferguson , Mourinho & Wenger .
AVB may not have been everyones choice but he was the best option .Harry left Levy no choice .You don`t give people like harry long term deals & the club in their hands .Have you seen Portsmouth ? close to extinction .Mandaric & Harry together ruined that club ,glad he`s gone .
Also it's a bit old skool saying captains needs to be vocal, King wasn't. A Captain is someone who leadsby example and has the respect of his teammates, regardless if he shouts and hollas.
One of the biggest critcisms of Redknapp was his supposed tactical ineptness and lack of preperation but in Villas-Boas we have one of the real pioneers of football theory. Like Wenger and Mourinho, he's a phylosopher and work-aholic. At this moment in time, regardless of whether he was your particular first choice or not...if you were one of those campaigning for Rednapp's sacking, and RagingSpur was...you dont have the right to criticise AVB.
RagingSpur - If we're sitting with 2 points after 10 games then fair enough, beat away...but until then, keep your "HE IS THE ONE WHO HAS TO MAKE ME RESPECT HIM" nonsense to yourself.
You seriously have to ask where it will end. Will we be banned for responding to other posters because our response wasn't article related? Will we be banned for going "off topic"? You might think I'm merely scaremongering, but its not beyond the realms of possibility.
Wonder how long my rant about this will be allowed to stay up?
Spurs doesn't need as many major changes to the squad as Chelsea did so let's see how he handles a whole season at Spurs before we write him off completely.
After his first season he'll have a whole transfer window to make any major changes to the squad. That is when i EXPECT good signings and when i EXPECT to see results. We had this conversation the other day however, and we don't see eye to eye on a suitable time frame for the man to do great things.
Harry didn't finish top four in his first season so can we at least try give AVB the same time frame (ok a few months longer) before we start writing him off? You're not gonna get any brownie points for saying i told you so down the line, you're just losing face with supporters now.
I had virtually quit this site about 6 months ago because I was sick of listening to everyone crying their eyes out about Redknapp. I think we could maybe do with a few months of optimism for a change...or at least just a "lets just wait and see" type of attitude.
Spot on .Lets give the man a chance ,AVB at least deserves that .
Praise & criticism should be given when due .AVB as it stands is due neither .
For the record, AVB was not in my top 5, but I will give him the benefit of the doubt. Lastly, if you have tickets for the first two home games and can't bear to watch the fiasco, my wife and I would be honoured to suffer. COYS
What you both fail to realise is that we are being censored for posting trivia, whilst outright abuse is perfectly acceptable. Please explain to me how that is a sane & sensible way to moderate posts. Its akin to letting off muggers while stamping down hard on those leaving their bins out too early. The policy of the madhouse.
Even though you might not like the "1st" post game, is it really that heinous that it should be banned whilst allowing abuse? Isn't that an oxymoron in moderating terms?
We've all laughed at Rocky 7 on Vital Arsenal & Merlin on Vital Chelsea for deleting p1$$ taking posts we've put up on their sites, yet somehow, Oxfordspur's deleting of harmless posts is somehow alright. I just don't get it & I'm sure VS has lost more members through personal abuse than for being fed up with "1st" posts!
Bizarre.
I guess the only way we might get him to see reason is if enough of us were to email him, as the couple of moaners did, & complain about the censorship, he just might do something, but I'm not holding my breath as he's firmly on the "against" side of this argument. That would be fair enough if he was being fair, but he isn't.
I did not see anything "pony" about Vertonghen yesterday. Competent first outing, IMO. COYS
Oxfordshire had a point & if you can`t see his point then WOW ,it`s getting cringey now .
I'm sick of us building teams around players who clearly see us as a shop window, we should work to become the club players gaze in awe at and selling our prized assets every 3 or 4 years isn't the way to go. This season is shaping up to be a real struggle and AVB could well end up being the fall guy for the boards lack of direction.
When you have a bank account that reads in the millions, how much more do you really need? At a conservative estimate I would guess that Adebayor has £10mill+ tucked away and his properties are all paid for. He professes to love the game yet would rather sit on the bench for city and not play just for the sake of ££££'s. He's been offered probably £5million a year a Spurs along with the knowledge that he'll be a regular starter and still it ain't enough. Well f*** you Adebayor, we want players who want to play for the shirt and not the money. The guy has already got more money than he could ever have dreamt of growing up and now he's let greed become more important than the game that made him rich.
Granted if you're on £20K a year and someone offers you £10k a year for the same job at nicer offices, of course you'll turn it down. But if yu've been earning £10millon a year for 3 years and you ain't happy there, why wouldn't you take £5million a year and be happy? Greed is why.
Every club with a decent striker knows we are desperate for front men so the price is going to be overinflated. Levy has two choices as I see it, buy young unproven talent or pay over the top. I guess he could also do nothing and leave us and AVB in the lurch. This is down to penny pinching and our last managers inability to spot a player under 30.
It doesn't matter whether you are bothered by the "game" or not, you SHOULD be bothered about the deletion of it. This site has rightly been lauded for its tolerance, well there is very little tolerance on this issue now. Oxfordspurs has taken the 1st step towards moderator imposed censorship & that should worry us all. How long before it becomes something else that is deemed an irritant & worthy of deletion?
The purpose of Oxfordspur's article achieved its objective, to reproduce the quote from the emailer he used:
"Your piece 'Moutinho for Modric is good for Spurs!' was well written but 5 of the first 6 comments are about who posted a response first. This stuff stops people from reading on - it's so juvenile."
The nature of the "game" changed as a result, to the point where they are not as celebratory & juvenile as they used to be & there are no longer 5 or 6 comments before the articles get discussed. That is quite a significant change which should have been the end of it &, to any fair minded person, it would've been reasonable to have left it there.
We all have a choice, those of us who want to treat articles with a scientific seriousness are free to do so, those who want to have some fun should be free to do so as well. I'm sure there are discussion forums out there that cater for both individually & if there aren't, well, there's an opportunity for someone. How about "Seriously Spurs" or "The Spurs Silly Season"?
Its a shame about Chrishove, but maybe he's right to have done it.
When I've calmed down & can find some time, I'm going to crystalise my thoughts & put them in an email to Oxfordspur & try to get him to compromise on this issue as that's the ONLY solution to this complete intolerance. Compromise has been lost on this so far.
I just find it bizarre that vile abuse is allowed, but harmless fun isn't & that simply can't be right.
As for me, this is the closest I've ever come to quitting on VS, not even saltycellars was able to wind me up that much.
Our society prides itself on tolerance & free speech, I won't allow this zero tolerance without compromise on VS to continue any longer than I have to. As I said, Oxfordspur's article solved the basic problem & to continue to prosecute it is way, way over the top. If I fail to get Oxfordspur to see reason & compromise, then that'll be it for me, I'll quit VS for good.
I don't want ANY VS member to quit because of abuse or irritating posts, all I want is a level, fair playing field. I'm sorry that you & others don't see it that way.
And I think Christian Eriksen will be a decent buy, had a poor Uefa, but is more in ourprice range, and does a similiar job to what Modric does for us.
So we can only talk about football and article related issues, ok so when another member(s) are talking about where they live, or what job they do etc etc they should be deleted, im not gonna lie, I don’t really give a flying phuck as to those sorts of things but I don’t kick off about it, I just simply DON’T PHUCKIN READ IT!!! Some people just need to grow up…including Oxfordspur!
My position on this has nothing to do with "1st" posts, that was simply the vehicle that prompted the unprecedented situation that for the first time on VS, certain types of posts are to be universally deleted. Never mind arbitrarily allowing abuse whilst deleting a little bit of fun, the issue for me is NOT the fact one or two VSers exercised their right to complain to the moderator about what they saw as a puerile game that distracted from the point of an article, its that their view was given sole precedence to the exclusion of everyone else whilst at the same time allowing other more serious issues, like abuse to carry on unchallenged.
There's a serious point to all this that goes beyond fairness or whether you like or dislike the 1st post game & I just worry what will be banned next. If we allow this, we must allow everything our moderator deems unacceptable, no matter how inoffensive it might appear to you.
I will fight for the right to party! :-)
Time now to deal directly with Oxfordspur - when I've calmed down & can get across to him in a reasoned manner! ;-)
I'm done with this today. COYS!
Hurry up and spend some proper money!!!
City
Chelsea
United
Arsenal
Spurs
Liverpool
Newcastle
Fulham
Enough from me now.