Writer: Yorkspur 
Date:Saturday October 13 2012
Time: 1:08PM
One of the hottest topics of the last week has been that of diving, with Luis Suarez and Gareth Bale taking centre stage.
Pundits and players alike are joining the growing clamour of disapproval for what were blatant acts of cheating on the football field. It feels so much worse when it's one of our own doing it; the only good thing this week is that the Spurs community is pretty much united in its disapproval of Bale's act. Diving isn't new but it's not going away. The yellow card that should be given to the diving player is often not given. The idea of retrospectively punishing players for diving has been mooted, and this makes a lot of sense - it is often difficult for referees to be sure if contact was made, if the player dived or was fouled, but with the aid of video evidence after the match it would be much easier to make a decision on this.
A retrospective one or two match ban for diving would surely make players think twice about doing it. In addition, I am also pretty sick of seeing players rolling around on the floor after challenges, in an attempt either to run down the clock or to get the opposition player booked. Didier Drogba provides an excellent example of this: A man who stands at 6 feet 2 inches and 14 stone, it would usually take some amount of machinery to knock him over. Put him in a Chelsea shirt and a strong breeze will do it. Our very own Gareth Bale has also made an unfortunate name for himself in this regard - how often do we see him in the fetal position, rolling around and punching the ground in anguish after a heavier than usual contact?
It's cheating and it's not acceptable, and yet it's now pretty much accepted as part of the game. It's sad really. I would like to see the FA introduce an injury bin to football matches. If a player is rolling around on the floor the clock should be stopped and the player should be stretchered off and remain off the pitch for a minimum of five minutes to receive the treatment that they apparently need. No booking, just off the pitch for that time. The innocent, that is, those who actually are injured, would be unaffected, as they would have to leave the pitch anyway. Imagine a team, a goal up with 10 minutes to play but under the cosh - currently this would be prime time for a spot of play acting to waste a minute or two.
It would be far less likely to happen if the players knew that their team would be down to ten men for much of the rest of the match, managers and team mates alike would not stand for it, especially if goals were conceded as a result. This would be a good time to take action on diving and play acting, as they are very much in the limelight. The question is, will the FA bite the bullet?
Written by Yorkspur
With friends like Madrid … (Tuesday June 18 2013)
Reality cheque!! (Tuesday June 18 2013)
Utter Nonsense (Monday June 17 2013)
Our midfield… (Monday June 17 2013)
WHO, WHERE and WHY?. (Sunday June 16 2013)
Adam Smith wants chance at Spurs or PL loan. (Saturday June 15 2013)
Musings of Nonsensical proportions. (Friday June 14 2013)
Wilshere to Man Utd (Friday June 14 2013)
What is an offer we can't refuse? (Thursday June 13 2013)
Now and Then (Thursday June 13 2013)
| 1. | 80deg16minW | 227 |
| 2. | Spursex | 202 |
| 3. | Real Deal | 149 |
| 4. | spurdon | 123 |
| 5. | coopsieyid | 115 |
| 6. | ScottDaYid | 78 |
| 7. | Spurfect11 | 65 |
| 8. | redbloodcell | 63 |
| 9. | Kinygerbils | 62 |
| 10. | Big Chiv | 59 |
| Latest Results | ||||
| Spurs | 1 | - | 0 | Sunderland |
| Stoke | 1 | - | 2 | Spurs |
| Chelsea | 2 | - | 2 | Spurs |
| Spurs | 1 | - | 0 | Southampton |
| Wigan | 2 | - | 2 | Spurs |
| Spurs | 3 | - | 1 | Man City |
| Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
| 2. Man City | 38 | 23 | 9 | 6 | 32 | 78 |
| 3. Chelsea | 38 | 22 | 9 | 7 | 36 | 75 |
| 4. Arsenal | 38 | 21 | 10 | 7 | 35 | 73 |
| 5. Spurs | 38 | 21 | 9 | 8 | 20 | 72 |
| 6. Everton | 38 | 16 | 15 | 7 | 15 | 63 |
| 7. Liverpool | 38 | 16 | 13 | 9 | 28 | 61 |
| 8. WBA | 38 | 14 | 7 | 17 | -4 | 49 |
| Madness Confirmed.
» Newcastle : 18/06/2013 21:48:00
|
| Liverpool: International Heartbreak For Borini
» Liverpool : 18/06/2013 21:17:00
|
| Elliot Ward Joins Bournemouth
» Norwich : 18/06/2013 20:38:00
|
| Isco Torn Between Man City amp; Real Madrid
» Man City : 18/06/2013 20:13:00
|
| Yankees' Lawyer on Man City MLS Partnership
» Man City : 18/06/2013 19:59:00
|
| Pennant Given Another Chance
» Stoke : 18/06/2013 18:20:00
|
| Hawk-Eye Comes To The Hawthorns
» WBA : 18/06/2013 18:11:00
|
They also need to sort out this hand ball thing - ball to hand or just hand ball or depends on where you hand is or how close you are - it's a mine field. personally some hand balls are unavoidable and get punished and some are deliberate and don't get punished. Same with shoulder barging, obstructions, holding shirts etc etc
The game stinks and with technology and immediate punishment and long term punishment with some clarity of rules regarding above mentioned the game would improve.
However, in all honesty players and managers don't really want any of it to go ahead because a lot of them like to cheat - it's reflection of life in many ways.
When I played footy I NEVER cheated in fact I did everything to stay on my feet and I got battered but had a good reputation and respect and that is what was more important to me. Now days players get a slight knock and they roll around no way does it hurt it didn't hurt me and I took a lot harder knocks - whimps and they say it's a man's game - don't make me laugh.
Stop this cheating and we would see better footy imo players will express themselves and we will see better score lines and games. Plus stopped paying them so much and sort out this contract stuff - do they not know the meaning of the word LOYALTY.
One thing I think would improve the game is. If a player is injured by a foul that is a yellow card offence and the player has to be subbed. then the player committing the offence should also have to be subbed. It's infuriating when a team has to remove one of its best players due to yellow card challenges when the team committing the offence suffers no punishment. Trouble is, the more I think about it, the more I think that some managers (Pulis, Aladice) would use the rule tactically to injure another teams better players in order to gain an advantage.
At the end of the season the ten teams with the best disciplinary records get 10, 9, 8, 7...........3, 2, 1 points awarded and the ten worst get those same points deducted. So the team with the best disciplinary record would get 10 points from the team with the worst and so on. Is it feasible? Certainly worth a look I think.