Writer: Bernio Villas-Spuras
Date:Tuesday November 13 2012
As the debate rumbles on about whether or not to play a 4-4-2 system or stick with 4-5-1 (or whatever variation you want to conjure up, one question has been haunting me throughout - What is the difference in modern day football?
The 4-4-2 formation has almost become a taboo in football. Why on earth play such an archaic formation which isn't even thought of amongst the elite clubs in the world and is scoffed at by anyone with any kind of tactical nous. While it's true that a standard looking 4-4-2 isn't regularly seen in modern day football, I'm wondering whether most are kidding themselves that there's a difference between playing two strikers compared to playing someone 'just off the front man'.
A 4-5-1 by definition should make the midfield more compact when defending and will allow support to a front man when in possession - but really is that the case? In the last couple of seasons we've tried and tested a 4-5-1 with van der Vaart, Sigurdsson and Dempsey all having a stab and I have to question what any of them have brought to the table in terms of being a midfielder. Answer? Very little.
I then have to question why we would play someone 'off the lone striker' who isn't as comfortable scoring a hatful of goals as, say, a striker, but also isn't really (either) capable nor willing to put the work in defensively to see the benefit. Against Maribor and yes, I will use them as an example, Defoe and Adebayor looked as promising a partnership as any other combination we've tested. We simply didn't look any different. When one went forward, the other tracked back. Adebayor especially looked very capable at dropping deep and spreading the play, working channels etc and his unselfish and mature display that night led to a Defoe hat-trick.
I feel, of course, there are times and places to play a midfield trio, in games where we're scrapping for a point or hoping to nick all three, but it seems like we're playing with one striker just because it's more fashionable, rather than more effective. Obviously I'm willing as ever to debate and take other opinions on board, but my personal opinion is that playing one up front, while it can work, simply isn't this season and no player we've had to my knowledge has played the suspiciously ambiguous 'erm, not quite midfield, not quite striker' role effectively enough.
Written by Bernio Villas-Spuras
Date:Tuesday November 13 2012
In A THFC Far Far Away... (Monday October 12 2015)
The Death of International Football! (Monday October 12 2015)
Tottenham Hotspur Walking Wounded - Injury List (Friday October 9 2015)
No Fears Over Nabil! (Thursday October 8 2015)
Liverpool is "becoming a Tottenham" (Wednesday October 7 2015)
Fit To Top? (Tuesday October 6 2015)
The Curious Case Of Milos Veljkovic (Tuesday October 6 2015)
Swansea City vs Tottenham Hotspur. (Saturday October 3 2015)
Good or Bad For Delle? (Friday October 2 2015)
The Tottenham Hotspur Injury Table.. (Friday October 2 2015)
|5. Leicester City||8||4||3||1||2||15|
|6. West Ham||8||4||2||2||6||14|
|Don`t Rely on Lady Luck!
» Chelsea : 13/10/2015 18:51:00
|Sullivan Quashes Tomkins Newcastle Rumours
» West Ham : 13/10/2015 18:43:00
|Hammers Go Dutch!
» West Ham : 13/10/2015 18:35:00
|Ref Watch: Madley to officiate Swansea v Stoke
» Stoke : 13/10/2015 18:32:00
|Ivanovic Is Out - What Would You Do?
» Chelsea : 13/10/2015 17:53:00