Writer: Bernio Villas-Spuras
Date:Tuesday November 13 2012
As the debate rumbles on about whether or not to play a 4-4-2 system or stick with 4-5-1 (or whatever variation you want to conjure up, one question has been haunting me throughout - What is the difference in modern day football?
The 4-4-2 formation has almost become a taboo in football. Why on earth play such an archaic formation which isn't even thought of amongst the elite clubs in the world and is scoffed at by anyone with any kind of tactical nous. While it's true that a standard looking 4-4-2 isn't regularly seen in modern day football, I'm wondering whether most are kidding themselves that there's a difference between playing two strikers compared to playing someone 'just off the front man'.
A 4-5-1 by definition should make the midfield more compact when defending and will allow support to a front man when in possession - but really is that the case? In the last couple of seasons we've tried and tested a 4-5-1 with van der Vaart, Sigurdsson and Dempsey all having a stab and I have to question what any of them have brought to the table in terms of being a midfielder. Answer? Very little.
I then have to question why we would play someone 'off the lone striker' who isn't as comfortable scoring a hatful of goals as, say, a striker, but also isn't really (either) capable nor willing to put the work in defensively to see the benefit. Against Maribor and yes, I will use them as an example, Defoe and Adebayor looked as promising a partnership as any other combination we've tested. We simply didn't look any different. When one went forward, the other tracked back. Adebayor especially looked very capable at dropping deep and spreading the play, working channels etc and his unselfish and mature display that night led to a Defoe hat-trick.
I feel, of course, there are times and places to play a midfield trio, in games where we're scrapping for a point or hoping to nick all three, but it seems like we're playing with one striker just because it's more fashionable, rather than more effective. Obviously I'm willing as ever to debate and take other opinions on board, but my personal opinion is that playing one up front, while it can work, simply isn't this season and no player we've had to my knowledge has played the suspiciously ambiguous 'erm, not quite midfield, not quite striker' role effectively enough.
Written by Bernio Villas-Spuras
Date:Tuesday November 13 2012
Is Tom Back In The Game? (Tuesday March 31 2015)
Best of a Bad Bunch? (Tuesday March 31 2015)
Transfer Strategy (Monday March 30 2015)
THE MAN WHO CAN DO NO WRONG! (Saturday March 28 2015)
The Tottenham Hotspur Injury Table Situation (Friday March 27 2015)
Decision Time For Dembele? (Thursday March 26 2015)
Back the Man in White! (Thursday March 26 2015)
Rose Out Of England Squad! (Thursday March 26 2015)
Zero Net Spend. (Wednesday March 25 2015)
Another Man`s Misfortune. (Tuesday March 24 2015)
|4. Man Utd||30||17||8||5||25||59|
|9. West Ham||30||11||9||10||3||42|
|Coates Looking To Stay In Premier League
» Sunderland : 01/04/2015 12:20:01
|Brown Out Of Derby Clash.
» Sunderland : 01/04/2015 11:52:01
|Could Lukaku make Italian move?
» Everton : 01/04/2015 11:00:01
|Aston Villa - On This Day - 01/04 - A Look Back
» Aston Villa : 01/04/2015 11:00:00
|Everton interested in
» Everton : 01/04/2015 10:00:01