Writer: lordjohnny 
Date:Monday November 26 2012
Time: 8:55AM
Let's face it. Most football these days is so boring it makes us long for a Michael Carrick post match interview. However, things may be about to change. Thanks to people's pundit Stanley Collymore, he's promoting a new and radical approach to post-match interviews, and they could be on the way, if he has anything to do with it.
No more the run-of-the-mill monosyllabic crapola with an acquiescent and trembling Geoff Shreeves pat-balling the usual suspect players and managers with a piercing 'why were you so brilliant today?' in-shallow interrogation, dear me no. Thanks to strenuous efforts from our very own Stan-of-the people, we can expect a change from the status quo, which, if he has his way, will include the questioning of referees after the final whistle, to find out why they gave the decisions they did during the game.
Oh, but I hear the more sensible of you say, surely their response will be self-evident, and they will say simply that they had one go at making a decision, and didn't have the benefit of 25 camera angles. In short they will be humiliated in front of a world-wide audience. What's not to like as far as Stanley is concerned?
Now obviously, unless refs are going to give chapter and verse about how they deliberately made those mistakes, pull £50 notes from their cards pocket, cackle, rub their moustache, and, perhaps, try out their newly acquired bookies tic-tac suggestively on the TV continuity girl, we ain't gonna be any the wiser. However, the general idea is brilliant, if applied to all other interviewees, as it will also put players and managers on the spot in the same way.
Great. So I may assume we'll no longer have to suffer some mouth-breathing git looking at his boots, swigging a bottle of hypozade, while he speaks his brains about appreciating the gaffer, getting his opportunity, blah blah blah, a great ball from Wiggsy, Giggsy, or Biggsy etc etc, and, lo, the heavens open, and we'll have a bit more variety to post match interviews.
Surely if we are going to put refs on the spot, and they are shown their errors in glaring HD in front of the watching millions, and then asked for that totally redundant response, won't it be great for us, the viewing and paying public, not just to get the predictably dull MOM attendee to go through the motions, and mumble his thanks and walk off with a bottle of fizz, but, MUCH, MUCH more interestingly, get the diver in front of the cameras to explain his cheating, in full thespian slow-mo, the loutish tackler to justify his over the top sending off, and ask if he has any message for his victim, now lying in hospital, or (plump up the cushions), the likes of Wenger or Ferguson to respond to accusations of bad sportsmanship, and given the full Paxmanesque treatment if their answers come up short.
I'd especially like an Allardyce interview which went off-message, and asked him why he didn't sue Panorama, when he said he would all those years ago? After all, if refs are going to get the third degree, we might then get proper interviews with the real culprits, who cost us so much to watch the flaming game in the first place. Well done Stanley.
Written by lordjohnny
Baldini confirmed! (Wednesday June 19 2013)
It's probably Nonsense. (Wednesday June 19 2013)
Fixtures for next season! (Wednesday June 19 2013)
With friends like Madrid … (Tuesday June 18 2013)
Reality cheque!! (Tuesday June 18 2013)
Utter Nonsense (Monday June 17 2013)
Our midfield… (Monday June 17 2013)
WHO, WHERE and WHY?. (Sunday June 16 2013)
Adam Smith wants chance at Spurs or PL loan. (Saturday June 15 2013)
Musings of Nonsensical proportions. (Friday June 14 2013)
| 1. | 80deg16minW | 252 |
| 2. | Spursex | 232 |
| 3. | Real Deal | 161 |
| 4. | spurdon | 127 |
| 5. | coopsieyid | 122 |
| 6. | ScottDaYid | 92 |
| 7. | Spurfect11 | 78 |
| 8. | Kinygerbils | 72 |
| 9. | redbloodcell | 71 |
| 10. | ahx00 | 66 |
| Latest Results |
| Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
| 12. Newcastle | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13. Norwich | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14. Southampton | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15. Spurs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16. Stoke | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17. Sunderland | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18. Swansea | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Di Santo`s Decision
» Chelsea : 20/06/2013 13:09:00
|
| Stoch in Premier League Return?
» Chelsea : 20/06/2013 13:08:00
|
| Happy Birthday Frank
» Chelsea : 20/06/2013 13:06:00
|
| Has He Bentekin' Us All For Fools?
» Aston Villa : 20/06/2013 12:50:00
|
| Hughton: 'RVW Can Make The Difference'
» Norwich : 20/06/2013 12:05:00
|
| Never Fear, Look On The Brightside
» Aston Villa : 20/06/2013 10:21:00
|
| Sunderland Sign Swedish Forward
» Sunderland : 20/06/2013 10:06:00
|
Not smart, not smart at all. Hardly going to give us any great insight.
What might help is if the ref's written reports were published post match and then proper consideration given to their decisions and performances, and perhaps even post match press conferences the next day as often happens in Spain or Italy...but apart from that I think Stan has done what Stan always does namely; shooting from the lip.
good example is Abner Mares vs Joseph Agbeko, where the ref Russell Mora, allows several low blows from Mares to go unpunished, before completely missing a blatant low blow that sent Agbeko to the canvas giving his opponent a crucial 10-8 round.
vid of that ref interviewed post fight: funny how Mora tries to defend his decisions then is forced to watch replays of his awful mistakes in front of everyone. He is even told to his face that others ringside believed it to be the worst officiating they had ever seen. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3ldZ2o13CU
Don`t have these problems in Rugby where the men are real men .Respect the ref or start dishing out yellows .IMO it`s disgraceful how refs are treated at times & they need more help ,& more protection .
Refs are constantly in short supply as it`s a job not many want to do .Start getting them to explain their decisions they`ll be there all night .They make mistakes ,deal with it