Writer: OxfordSpur 
Date:Wednesday January 2 2013
Time: 11:42AM
Transfer windows like this one are all the more challenging for players, managers, owners and of course fans.
The reason why there is that extra confusion in my mind and no doubt many of yours is that when we have a new(ish) manager who is perhaps still looking to impart his ideas on the players and hope he has already proved his own ability to persuade the owner to part with enough money and also trust his judgment over others who perhaps have a closer and longer relationship. We also have to consider the extra cost and upheaval that comes with making any, let alone many changes halfway through a season, so there is always a thinking that unless it ain't broke, don't try to fix it or unless it is for an absolute steal, don't buy it.
Of course we probably know where we would like to add quality, and I hope that AVB and his team already have a definite plan in place for who is and isn't part of his plans and also where he needs to add quality or depth. You do wonder whether there are players at the club who feel they are surplus, whilst I imagine a few already are very well aware that they are not in the managers plans and will either me sold or loaned at the best, if not first opportunity. Others will of course be loaned out either because it is a last chance to prove their worth to to simply gain experience, hopefully in as positive a way as Danny Rose is doing at Sunderland.
Question is who is potentially available and who might be sacrificed to get in quick money or if we can bring in other players? You assume that Jenas, Bentley and Gomes are already out of AVB's thinking and deals are already in the pipeline. Whether JJ will remain at Notts Forest remains up for debate. He still struggles with injury, but their fans rate and like him on the rare occasions he plays, and though they have surprisingly replaced Shaun O'Driscoll, who was apparently initially sceptical about bringing in Jenas, he has been replaced by Alex McLeish, who signed the player on loan for Villa last season, so despite him missing nearly all of that time due to snapping his Achilles, he clearly felt he was a good player.
Bentley is out of contract in the summer, therefore you feel that Spurs would accept any early deal, but equally you feel that Bentley may well prefer to bide his time and take a free transfer if he could get it and pocket the extra cash that may be available in the summer. a good and impressive domestic loan in between seems the compromise. Apparently Wigan are interested and I actually feel this could be a decent move. As for Gomes, he is already back in Brazil, which has prompted the suggestion that he is lined up for a move. Rumours that he could be a makeweight in a deal to sign Leandro Damiao from Internacional, may or may not have legs, but for Levy just getting Gomes and others off the payroll, will be a positive. If we generously accept that Bentley, JJ, Gomes and the already departed Cudicini earned an average of 40 grand a week, thats £8 million off of the wage bill.
Looking at those who are actively in the current squad, you still have to question the long term future of Michael Dawson, simply because AVB was prepared to sell him in the summer. Has his recent form coupled with attitude and effort on the training ground altered his thinking? Dawson is a strong and solid stopper type of defender and one that appears well liked and respected in the dressing room, but in terms of his being picked against the physical teams such as Stoke, could we honestly say that a fit Younes Kaboul wouldn't offer the same qualities of strength, but also add footballing qualities and greater pace to what Daws has? It did cross my mind yesterday that William Gallas will be next out the door. Perhaps he was merely rested or carrying a slight knock, however his not even being on the bench hinted to me that he is on his way and perhaps Harry has already lined him up as a cheap or free addition to QPR?
In midfield, You do feel that Tom Huddlestone is a player that simply doesn't have a future at WHL. Personally I like him, but he still hasn't ironed out certain failings to his game and it is apparent that he will never have that speed or mobility to operate in a midfield two, especially when an opposition play three, and perhaps doesn't quite have the all-round quality of others at the club to ever be anything more than a squad player. A loan perhaps, but if a reasonable bid came in and there was already a replacement lined up, could or should we sell. With a slighty heavy heart, thinking what might have been, I feel it is a yes. Can we see a situation where we would still consider selling Scott Parker? He is a player I rate extremely highly and I wouldn't sell unless I received a truly stupid offer or the player made it clear he wanted out, but should for example AVB get in his dream player (Moutinho) could Parker be sacrificed if they could get their money back? Of the youth, I would like to see both Livermore and Carroll get half season loans, as I rate their potential, but do feel they need games and experience, so should we sign one and retain Sandro, Dembele and Parker and/or Hudd, would it make sense?
In attack, there aren't too many players to discuss, but I will start with one that is already on loan in Harry Kane. Though he seems certain to remain at Carrow Road to gain experience, he has suffered with missing the majority of the season to date with injury, but has received positive reviews in his last two games against Man City and West Ham and having the remainder of the season to hopefully establish himself in the starting XI, you feel this is the right decision. One thing that does worry me slightly is that Norwich have been linked with several strikers, either on loan or permanent deals. Would a new striker mean less opportunity for Harry, therefore could it be wise to move him on rather than be a bench warmer? With only two natural strikers, it seems impossible to imagine one leaving, even if we bought a new player in. However, do we still feel totally confident in believing that either Defoe or Adebayor would be happy playing second fiddle to a big money signing that might become the first choice pick?
Jermain Defoe, has done very well, but for all his goals and all-round improvement to his game, he remains a poacher first and foremost and his default move is still to turn and shoot instead of looking for better positioned options. He is great facing goal and as a natural finisher, but does he really have that all-round game to bring the best out of those around him? Perhaps one to keep as a good and loyal option, but is he ever going to be a long term solution under AVB? As for Adebayor, he remains a bit of an enigma, on his day he is a brilliant and unplayable striker, but those days simply haven't happened enough this season, perhaps due to injury, lack of confidence or simply a lack of understanding or chemistry with his playing partner. Would it really be a shock if we were to sell him in the summer or even in January of an offer was made? I can't imagine he would embrace another striker that would limit his opportunities further and he has never been happy to be a squad option. Though I clearly don't know the exact details of his summer move from City, I do wonder if his pay-off from City and new wage at WHL would actually make it easier to sell him, as his wages would be more realistic and therefore easier to do a deal.
The fact Spurs seem to operate a committee approach to buying and selling perhaps makes things harder to make decisions, but in turn perhaps at least share the blame when a player fails. I can imagine Levy, Sherwood, Freund and AVB all sitting around a table with their player wants and reasons firmly in hand. Does this make for good policy of buying or selling? Without being a fly on the wall, I really don't know the dynamics of what goes on, but I would like to think that AVB will be the man who gets what he wants more than doesn't, as to date he deserves backing, but I also see no point in his being forced to buy or sell players he doesn't really fancy. To date I haven't heard of too many turkeys being touted to come in, whilst equally I haven't seen too many superstars of shocks going out. Bale to Madrid in the summer for £50m+ is clearly an option, but is that something that could be out of everyones hands if the bid came in and the player wanted the move. Long term contract or not...
Early bird catches the worm (Friday May 24 2013)
Should we worry about AVB rumours? (Friday May 24 2013)
Jamaica 0-0 Tottenham. (Friday May 24 2013)
In Levy We Trust* (Thursday May 23 2013)
Bale to Stay; But where does he Play? (Thursday May 23 2013)
The Cantona of North London! (Wednesday May 22 2013)
End of Term Report (Wednesday May 22 2013)
2013/2014 - The year of change (Wednesday May 22 2013)
Damned if we do (Tuesday May 21 2013)
Silly season is here!! (Tuesday May 21 2013)
| 1. | 80deg16minW | 609 |
| 2. | Real Deal | 371 |
| 3. | Spursex | 327 |
| 4. | The Corner Pin | 296 |
| 5. | Big Chiv | 292 |
| 6. | Galvin's Shinpads | 266 |
| 7. | Spurfect11 | 261 |
| 8. | griddo | 209 |
| 9. | USAFSPURS | 185 |
| 10. | redbloodcell | 185 |
| Latest Results | ||||
| Spurs | 1 | - | 0 | Sunderland |
| Stoke | 1 | - | 2 | Spurs |
| Chelsea | 2 | - | 2 | Spurs |
| Spurs | 1 | - | 0 | Southampton |
| Wigan | 2 | - | 2 | Spurs |
| Spurs | 3 | - | 1 | Man City |
| Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
| 2. Man City | 38 | 23 | 9 | 6 | 32 | 78 |
| 3. Chelsea | 38 | 22 | 9 | 7 | 36 | 75 |
| 4. Arsenal | 38 | 21 | 10 | 7 | 35 | 73 |
| 5. Spurs | 38 | 21 | 9 | 8 | 20 | 72 |
| 6. Everton | 38 | 16 | 15 | 7 | 15 | 63 |
| 7. Liverpool | 38 | 16 | 13 | 9 | 28 | 61 |
| 8. WBA | 38 | 14 | 7 | 17 | -4 | 49 |
| Scout Report - Michael Hector
» Reading : 25/05/2013 10:00:00
|
| Wigan Athletic Season Review
» Wigan : 25/05/2013 07:00:00
|
| Stoke Man Of The Match
» Southampton : 24/05/2013 20:37:00
|
| Shaw This Can't Keep Happening To Luke
» Southampton : 24/05/2013 20:32:00
|
| Arsenal Close To £10m Williams Move?
» Swansea : 24/05/2013 20:04:00
|
| Liverpool: Werner hails 'Great Strategist' Rodgers
» Liverpool : 24/05/2013 19:37:00
|
| Liverpool: Robinson Gets England U21 Call
» Liverpool : 24/05/2013 18:03:00
|
COME ON MR LEVY... SURPRISE US..
I would sell Livermore or Huddlestone. In DMF we already have Sandro & Parker, provided if we buy someone like Moutinho.
Ox, why not a vital poll on this? :)
Levy has also learnt that it's worth checking the date of births of players as well. When the manager comes along and wants to buy one / sell one in Janury he needs to remind them that there is another one turning 21. In the case of next season we would need to register Caulker, Smith, Townsend, Mason and Parrett if AVB chose for them to be involved. Levy has taken longer than most chairman to get to grips with the 25 man squad rule. Hopefully he's finally sussed it now though and will help AVB have quality versus Harry's quantity of players.
I therefore expect a number of sales, loans and a couple of signings. I am not overly optimistic about TWO high profile additions and will be content with ONE. I expect several of our youngsters to be sent on loan.
ONE striker and ONE young/upcoming midfielder may be the best compromise. Though knowing Levy, lastminute.com may be on the horizon! COYS!
Of the obvious Jenas, Bentley and Gomes (I would keep Gomes and sell Grandpa) I think we should make room for our emerging youngsters and sell Hudd or maybe Livermore. Perhaps Livermore should be loaned out and see if he can progress to become Parker replacement in the future. We definitely should not sell Parker in this window. He has looked great and we stopped conceding late goals when he returned.
Massive respect for V.D.V for what he did at Spurs & hope him & the missus can get back together .Always under the impression he left Spurs to make her happy but still was not enough
Why do people rave about Daniel Sturridge ? Spurs fans will be well chuffed we missed out on him in a couple of seasons ,one of AVB`s biggest faults at Chelsea was standing by him ,& Meireles .
Theres no I in T.E.A.M & we need team players .Sell Adebayor & bring in 2 strikers & a winger to compete with the brilliant Bale & the improving Lennon (keep it going ) . Competition is good & the bench is a little weak
On loans, I agree that both Livermore and Carroll would benefit from PL loans, but then arn't we limited to 2 players bein loaned out? I do not see Kane or Rose comng back or being sold, so loans will be pretty tough.
Bringing in Moutinho (who I don't think we need and if there is truth to the Holtby rumours, there is no need at all) would most certainly mean that Parker would have to go. I can't recall how many more years Parker has on his deal, but I do know he came to play. I don't see how he pushes Sandro or Dembele out of the lineup. If he's happy being a sub, I suppose it's ok, though it is a very expensive sub and he really is not suited to replacing Dembele as he does not push the ball forward. Hudd needs to go as it seems he will not get sufficient time unless there are massive injuries and, if that is the case, I'd much prefer to see Carroll out there than Hudd. I like Hudd, but I do not see how he will play at his best if he is not playing everyday. His talent has been surpassed by those around him, so he can only hope to be a bit player and that will see his career go down the toilet.
Gallas is just not up to it. Sell him, or let him go. As I understand it, he is on a year to year basis anyway. Just having his wages off the payroll would be a huge help. Dawson, IMO, has done everything I would expect from a number 4 CB. Been solid when called upon and remains very powerful in the air. If we bring in a player like Vanderweirald, fine, he can go, but if it's to be our number 4 CB, a more professional player you will not find.
Gomes and Bentley have been out of the squad for too long. Gomes has said he wants to go back to Brazil once his contract is up, so he'll be gone in 18 months. Bentley will be gone at season's end. If either can be moved now, great. Further wages off the payroll. Jenas, moved is best, but if not and the loan in the Championship can continue, that's fine. I believe he too is gone in 18 months.
Striker, for me, remains, by far, the largest issue. Nothing I have seen suggests that Defoe plays well alongside Ade or Dempsey and while Defoe's numbers are the same as always, Adebayor and Dempsey are both drastically diminished when out with Defoe, whether 4-5-1 or 4-4-2. Don't see much suggesting that Sigurdsson behind Defoe would work either. My largest worry is that we may well be handcufed by the contracts that Adebayor and Dempsey have and still believe that Defoe is best used as an impact sub. I'd really like to see Adebayor tucked just behind Dempsey in a 4-4-2. Let Adebayor be the hold-up guy and let Dempsey try to get on the end of crosses and work with Adebayor to clog up the middle allowing Bale and Lennon more room out wide.
Get Leandro, Willian and Holtby and we may well become one of the best attacking clubs in the premiership. I already believe we are well on the way to being one of the better defensive teams in the PL and we have been missing Parker, Kaboul, BAE and weren't playing Lloris. Let's keep it going. Onward and upward. The Future is Bright, the Future is Lillywhite. COYS
Stats for the current season for the games to date.
Shots on target - 214 Goals scored - 39
shots scored - 18.22%
Opp Shots on target - 110 Opp Goals scored - 27
Opp shots scored - 24.55%
Or in other words our conversion rate of shots on target is about 25% poorer than the strike forces of the team's we have played.
A striker has to be our main priority, followed by a creative midfielder, not the other way round. The striker will get the goals we need to get all the points we can from all but the top 3 or 4 sides. The creative mid will improve our chances against the top 3 or 4 sides, but that will get us only a few more points - important points, but lets get points from the other 80% of teams first with a new striker...
We should be gutted about the ACON taking our players but in case no chance .Due to a pay dispute he may not go ,i for 1 hope he does .Poor player ,poor character ,not ticking any boxes to warrant any praise
As for the kids you mention, most of what I have read have Coulibaly a long way off (very inconsistent) and Ceballos being a little too lightweight. Time will tell but Carroll, Parrott and Mason all seem closest to the squad and they each have a long way to go before any squad member is sold to allow them to play. COYS
I`m pleased we missed out on him
"Just been listening to Talksport, and their Brazilian reporter was saying we are deffo in for Leandro, but 3rd party ownership has been our problem trying to sign him previously" .....
Then somebody suggested that we've surely spent the last 3 years trying to look at a way around this, the response he got was thus......
"Yes, well apparently we have struggled to get all parties around the table to even discuss the deal, but the reporter seems to think now is our best chance of getting him, as Internacional need to trim there wage bill, and Leandro wants the move".......
So, there you go, another rumour to dismiss :)
I've got a question for the few that are saying Holtby would be a waste of time for us. What if AVB thinks differently? What if AVB actually likes the lad & thinks he's exactly what we need? This is the ONLY site I've been on that has anybody opposed to us signing him, let alone dismissing his talents. I'm not having a go, it's a genuine question & I'd be interested to know what you think IF AVB has identified Holtby as someone to add a different dimension to our somewhat 'creatively limited' midfield. I think the main reason I ask is because AVB identified & signed this little midfielder who he thought would add the creativity that the Chel$ki midfield was lacking, he was called Mata & hasn't turned out too shabby at all.
Mate, what is this "Sun" that you speak of??
We missed out on Moutinho because of third party ownership. The Leandro situation is the same. We can agree all we want with Internacionale and the player, but if the third party wants to be greedy (a la Moutinho), there is not much that can be done. I would still consider Isco, Eriksson, Holtby to be more realistic "needs" than Moutinho, who is a slight upgrade offensively on Dembele, but a considerable drop defensively. COYS
shedboy - I don't know who was responsible for identifying any of the players you mentioned mate. As I said in my question, rather than dismiss any potential signing as unnecessary, why not have a bit of faith in the manager & his decisions?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGes6_ypp28
shedboy - I can't argue/disagree with that mate, your eyes see what they see. As I stated yesterday, I've never even seen Holtby play at all, so am literally in no position to have any opinion as to whether we should or shouldn't sign the lad. I've simply tried to gain an understanding of peoples opinions about him, which you have kindly given me. And again, as I said lastnight, there could be people in Spain who hadn't seen much of Modric before his move to Madrid and think he's a poor player. We know differently though, don't we ;). I'm glad that the grass hasn't seemed to be greener for him :).. Back to Holtby, Something else I've read elsewhere, though we all know how much we shouldn't pay attention to IDK merchants. Talk has it that Holtby is indeed a player that AVB has identified as a possible target for us (some saying that the pre-contract is as good as signed) BUT Levy supposedly prefers the younger option of Eriksen. I struggle to believe that part of this Holtby rumour, mainly because Eriksen would cost upwards of £10mil (+wages, happy now Jod?) and Ajax, as we found out last summer with Vertonghen, are VERY difficult to deal with. There's also talk that Ajax are currently in the process of trying to force Eriksen into signing a new contract so that they can demand a bigger figure for him, but he's refusing.
"In the last TW I am sure JJ said Leando was 100% owned by Inter and there is no third party ownership".....
The response......
"I'm not sure if he did or not, but i can confirm that he is, when he signed his contract renewal last year Inter bought out the 3rd party ownership (which was Leandro's former club). So he is 100% Inter owned now."......
So we actually have a clear run at him this time IF we actually are interested!!
Peter, I hear you sir. It seems that AC Milan are no longer in the market for a striker, so that's potentially one less concern IF we are interested.
Just my opinion mate :)
Frank, to be clear, I meant that the skill set of Carroll, how he plays and what he is able to do on the ball, are as close as we have to Schneijder, which is exactly why a Schneijder-like player is what we desperately need. I believe Carroll to be a cross between Modric and Carrick, but that can only develop with time on the pitch. Schneijder, is the finished product, and he is a top player, though not as good as he was a few years ago. COYS
I too would love to see Levy get the go-ahead from Lewis to spend like a sailor in Tortuga, but what would be the net gain? Our CL year didn't see us pocket 20M. Where did all the dosh go? Salaries on players our manager could not even be bothered using. It was so bad that AVB needed to see 6 go plus another for any player we brought in. Huge task given the wages some of these guys were on. ManU made more in losing than Chelsea did in winning the CL. Then again, United won more money than Barca who beat them. The monies in CL have a lot to do with points in the group stages but it is also largely due to your TV popularity. If your club gets 20M from the CL but had a net spend of 20M, you didn't really make a cent. In fact, you lost commensurate with every salary amount that was increased. Leandro at 25M on a transfer fee will cost us likely another 20-25M on salary over 5 years. So we'd have to make CL twice in those 5 years, just to afford him.
I know you are not a Levy fan. I am. I can state categorically that for the first time since the 70's Spurs are now a going concern this side of the ocean. Every Spurs League game has been on cable. That is a huge change. UA in North America is now carrying Spurs merchandise. I can tell you for a fact that my only option up to this year was to buy the hideous blue Mansion shirt or buy off the website. Spurs merchandise was nowhere to be found. Spurs are more relevant now than 10 years ago and are worth considerably more. Sure, stadium is long overdue. Harry should never have been allowed to throw 40M at Defoe, Crouch, Keane, not including salary. I can pick bones with lots of decisions. Where I always back Levy is in the end result. 5th, 5th, 11th (CC win), 8th (CC final), 4th (FA Cup semi), 5th, 4th, currently 3rd, though Chelsea have games in hand. Fact is, we have gone from a mid-table team when ENIC took the reins to a team that is now in the CL conversation every year. That is a huge jump and we still are the 11th richest club.
This window and next we'll see how much of the non-buying was down to Harry's targets or Levy's refusal to spend. That said, none of that will resolve the main issue of needing to generate more income to be able to afford higher salaries while staying on budget. Other than Arsenal and ManU the teams around us are all, IMO, operating beyond their means. I do not advocate the sugar daddy route. COYS
Even this season after the cull we started this season with 30 players and saw Jenas, Bentley, Khumalo, Dawkins, Rose etc quickly loaned out to ease the squad proliferation, with 23 year old Obika not even getting a squad place and 4 very senior keepers draining the wage bill.
Levy must now know that is no way to run a club. I bet no team in the top flight have ended up loaning out more over 25's in the last few years than us. He isn't whiter than white but at least sees the errors of his ways and corrects them. As you say, at least we talk about Champs League EVERY season nowadays and our global brand is better than ever. He's a good guy who's made a few errors along the way but always has us trending in the right direction.
If Levy can't see the glaringly obvious re a striker, then he's wasting his time sitting in the Directors' box. I remain hopeful of seeing the new hit man within the next 10 days.......
Willian and Leandro would be too orgasmic to handle!
RAF, I agree that the 4-4-2 suits us best and that's why AVB is playing it, but it still does nothing to create chemistry between striers or get guys on the end of awesome, predictable crosses. So, in that regard it's still not working. The problem is, Defoe, up top of anyone, doesn't really work. I still maintain, 4-4-2, with the players we have, is the way to go. I would play Dempsey up top of Adebayor with Defoe coming on as a sub, but that's just me.
Muttley, Harry stockpiled. Pav had deals with Birmingham and in Russia, the Chairman wanted to sell. Harry said no. Yes, Levy could have forced Harry, but then why retain the manager. He'd allowed that mistake to happen at the end of Jol's tenure. He gives his managers what they want, so long as it fits in the financials.
ItalianYiddo, I still think AVB will go 4-5-1 if we get a Schneijder/Isco/Holtby/Eriksson/Pjanic type player.
Shedboy, we didn't have Parker avaiable. A healthy Parker could step in and play for Sando who could switch and play the Dembele role. f you have noticed, Sandro is going forward more and more.
QPR will be up for our game. That said, we are very good away from home and look to be more and more solid. We'll score for certain. The question is, can QPR manage more than 2? I doubt it. Anything can happen. Chelsea have a poor defence. They also have a really congested fixture list. Benitez tried to rest several players and it cost him. I would have rested them in th first leg of the Cup, but then what do I know? No team can be taken lightly. That said, QPR score less than a goal a game and concede almost 2 a game. Our squad is getting healthy. Dempsey, Ade and Sigurdsson all seem to be getting up to speed. Parker is back. BAE imminently. Kaboul a few weeks away. We just need to treat each game as the most important game of the season. AVB has also shown what real coaching can do within a game. COYS
I really hope it is US that edges them out of the CL spot this season. COYS!