Date:Wednesday January 9 2013
Two signings already announced is clearly a positive start to a window and a nice change from the usual last minute deals, but have we see a dramatic change in policy or the same but a little earlier?
So far we have had one exciting Bosman and one suggested £3m deal for a young and promising left back, however, does anyone really believe we have spent a definite THREE MILLION on a player that seems destined to start out in the development squad to continue learning his trade, with no guarantee of ever stepping up to become a first team regular? As usual, fans will herald any signing of youth or an exotic foreign name as a masterstroke and a potentially world-class signing, but as we have seen previously and all too often, outstanding prospects don't always become brilliant players.
I believe the £3m suggested may be based more on individual success, than a nailed on figure, perhaps just as United's asking price of £6m was in the summer. Who pays that much for an out of contract full back that has yet to make a breakthrough? If we were talking about Southampton's outstanding teenage left back and potential Gareth Bale copy, Luke Shaw, we might be talking, but can we imagine Mr Levy offering that much for a home-sick youngster who has yet to make the step up? I can't. It seems clear to me that although Spurs may well buy one, perhaps two quality players in this windows, any buys will have to be financed by money that is generated through sales, from this window and funds from the last one.
To me, the idea of balancing the books is a reasonable one and one that we probably need to accept for the medium to long term, as the game changes and clubs also accept that they cannot compete with the huge spenders, therefore they have to be more considered and long term in their building of a squad. Clubs like Tottenham still offer a very attractive stepping stone to any emerging player, such as Lewis Holtby, who would probably get swallowed up at the games elite and therefore see his development hampered. Players looking at long term development and career longevity will see what Spurs are doing and feel it is right for them, which works for our club just as much as it works for them.
Sure, we may well see a £15-20m striker, but will that mean we see the likes of Huddlestone and one or two others sold to at least part pay the fee? Perhaps we will get that play-maker like Moutonho, but haven't we already ear marked that money from the sale of Luka Modric (Hopefully we have a sell on clause, if Real decide to move him on…)? In recent windows, there has been a definite case of generating more money than has been spent, however it is also evident that individual wages on our better players has increased. Lowering squad numbers has assisted here, but at a time when the club are also looking at funds to build a stadium, is there a reality that this is our best and only realistic way forward for the next few years and the right way for a football club to be run regardless?..
Date:Wednesday January 9 2013
PATHETIC - EARLY GOALS (Wednesday April 16 2014)
Daniel Levy's Shoes?.. (Tuesday April 15 2014)
Who Plays Where? (Tuesday April 15 2014)
Who Is Your Favourite? (Monday April 14 2014)
WBA v Spurs: The Report! (Sunday April 13 2014)
Supporting Bayern Again... (Sunday April 13 2014)
West Bromwich Albion Vs. Tottenham Hotspur (Friday April 11 2014)
What do we really want? (Friday April 11 2014)
5..4..3..2..1… We have lift off! (Thursday April 10 2014)
VIDEO: Uncertainty Always There - Sherwood (Wednesday April 9 2014)
|3. Man City||32||22||4||6||54||70|
|7. Man Utd||33||17||6||10||18||57|
|Could Man City lose Champions League spot?
» Everton : 16/04/2014 11:00:00
|PATHETIC - EARLY GOALS
» Spurs : 16/04/2014 10:18:00
|The Goodison factor
» Everton : 16/04/2014 10:00:00
|So it's OK to dive sometimes?
» Arsenal : 16/04/2014 09:38:00
|Team News v Everton
» Crystal Palace : 16/04/2014 09:11:00
|Ince In Demand
» Crystal Palace : 16/04/2014 09:09:00
|It`s Good to Talk
» Fulham : 16/04/2014 07:43:00