Spurs - What next for Gomes, Bentley and JJ?
UK time is: 03:45:12
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

What next for Gomes, Bentley and JJ?

For all the talk about players arriving, Just for once, I want to look at those hopefully departing.

Now I don't want to start by being critical of any player, but it seems obvious that none of Heurelho Gomes, David Bentley or Jermaine Jenas are in AVB's plans and when we consider they are probably costing in excess of half a million pounds in wages every month, the idea of moving them on, offers massive appeal, especially to Daniel Levy, I'm sure. Perhaps losing these players is key to funding an early arrival of Lewis Holtby, as that money is roughly what it would cost to bring him in early and pay his wages for the remainder of the season.

Recently we saw that Gomes was heading back to Brazil and hopes were raised that he would find himself a club and perhaps even be part of a deal to bring Leandro Damiao to White Hart Lane. Supposedly he has now returned and there remains interest from home and abroad, but as has always been the case, wages are the stumbling block for any move. In truth I don't see too many obvious Premiership clubs that he could step into as first choice, though perhaps Fulham or Southampton are potential destinations, however you feel that Tottenham might have to pay something to get him off their books, either in the short or long term to compensate him for a probable drop in wages.

David Bentley is out of contract in the summer, therefore he potentially represents a bargain for someone who is willing to take a chance of his ability being rekindled. Though David has had a terrible time at WHL, I believe there is a talented player in there, perhaps just waiting for the right move and I actually feel he is someone that would do well at several Premiership clubs, though have his days as winger ended? With so many clubs forfeiting wide me and looking at more creative central players, I wonder if David could actually do very well in a more central role for someone and may well relish the opportunity to prove himself now he is seemingly fit after a series of injuries. at 28 years old, you assume there is plenty of worth in signing him on a short term deal for someone.

The problem that Jermaine has is his constant struggles with injury. This continued on loan at Notts Forest and you can't really see too many clubs taking a serious punt on him in this window, but the catch twenty-two here is that without games, he can't prove his fitness, but who in their right minds would pay anything other than peanuts to sign a player that has struggled do badly with injuries over a long period. This is of course as much a problem for Spurs as it is the player. This makes me wonder if there is a logic in Spurs loaning him out to anyone that is willing to take him and paying all or at least the majority of his salary? Realistically he is miles down our pecking order of central midfielders and will remain a financial liability as long as he is under contract, but without being able to prove he can play every week, he could be in career limbo for the remainder of his contract, so surely giving him away in the short term may at least give him the opportunity to find fitness and hopefully another club.

As things stand, all three are in our twenty-five man squad, but with little or no chance of playing. I'm sure the frustration for Mr Levy is that we have over 30m worth of player, wasting away and with little or no chance to recoup anything but a fraction of what we paid, but is it better to simply cut our losses and the wage bill, though there is always the situation that players expect to retain their earnings for as long as possible and that makes it all the harder to off-load anyone, especially when it comes to relocating and uprooting families, though you hope that all three will see they need to look elsewhere to rejuvenate their careers and perhaps Spurs need to help things along, even if it costs money in the short term...




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The journalist

Writer: OxfordSpur Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Tuesday January 22 2013

Time: 10:52AM

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Spurs Articles

Ten Years Ahead Of Our Time! (Sunday July 5 2015)

Deal Or No Deal? (Saturday July 4 2015)

Belgians, a Mexican & a Swiss! (Friday July 3 2015)

Two Out: Loads To Go! (Thursday July 2 2015)

Where Are They Now? (Thursday July 2 2015)

Holtby Deal Confirmed! (Wednesday July 1 2015)

Benteke: Yes or No? (Tuesday June 30 2015)

Paulinho Leaves! (Monday June 29 2015)

Archived Spurs Articles

List All Vital Spurs Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Premier League Network Sites

Vital Members League (view all)

1. Topspur1 39
2. Real Deal 33
3. Highgatespur 29
4. Spursex 29
5. Pollo 24
6. MAN ON! 20
7. TH4Life 17
8. a.k.a.james1spurs 16
9. Spurfect11 16
10. spurdon 14

League Results (view all)

Latest Results

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
11. Newcastle 0 0 0 0 0 0
12. Norwich 0 0 0 0 0 0
13. Southampton 0 0 0 0 0 0
14. Spurs 0 0 0 0 0 0
15. Stoke 0 0 0 0 0 0
16. Sunderland 0 0 0 0 0 0
17. Swansea 0 0 0 0 0 0

Spurs Fixtures (view all)

Breaking League News

Remy Linked to move to Turkish Club
Chelsea : 05/07/2015 17:46:01
NUFC Influx On The Way
Newcastle : 05/07/2015 17:32:01
Breaking The British Transfer Record?
Man City : 05/07/2015 16:36:01
Hammers Reject Set for Greek Football
West Ham : 05/07/2015 16:30:00
Costa Warms-Up in Kuwait 5-a-side Tournament
Chelsea : 05/07/2015 16:18:01

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Benteke; Yes or No?
Suggested By:  Vital Spurs
Yes, but he's only worth 15-20m 25%
Yes, but he's only worth 20-25m 11%
Yes, and I would pay his release clause if require 3%
Not for me! 61%