Spurs - Favorites or favouritism?
UK time is: 07:25:29
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Favorites or favouritism?

The headlines today reflect 'sniping' comments to the FA regarding Yaya Toure's seemingly unjust actions of patting RVWW back with his boot?

Whilst it was pretty obvious what Yaya was trying to achieve with his lashing out, it's hard to understand why a panel of 3 referees were unable to find him guilty of violent conduct? Whilst I find Mourinho fairly annoying these days with his media escapades I have to agree with him regarding this instance.

Chelsea manager Jose Mourinho, whose side face City in the FA Cup on Saturday, had earlier urged the FA to take action against Toure. He said: 'If the FA defends football, he has to be suspended.' When asked if he would be upset if the FA took no action, Mourinho replied: 'Of course or it is the same for everybody else from now.

'Every player feels that if the referee doesn't see, I can do. It doesn't matter the cameras, it doesn't matter the consequences because if the referee doesn't see, I can do it."

We also saw the thug Carroll take a swipe or swinging arm clipping Chico's pony tail a couple of weeks ago and this decision upheld? It brings into question firstly would the FA panel hold up the red card given to Carrol albeit there being slight contact for the sake of the referee or perhaps because West Ham are not really a big club?

Then we get City who have seen Yaya not punished for what seems to me as clear act of violent conduct go unpunished and to top it off we get RVWW saying he aint bothered and would rather see Yaya playing on the pitch than punished???

My second question being the title of 'Favorites' or 'Favoritism' for City who seem to have received one of the two with their lashings given week in and week out, but are they getting a free ride with referees and the FA (and some dodgy linesman) to achieve their new title stolen from the red side of Manchester?

Written by Mix26




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The journalist

Writer: Mix26 Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Tuesday February 11 2014

Time: 10:15AM

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Spurs Articles

Capoue Deal Confirmed! (Monday July 6 2015)

War! (Monday July 6 2015)

Ten Years Ahead Of Our Time! (Sunday July 5 2015)

Deal Or No Deal? (Saturday July 4 2015)

Belgians, a Mexican & a Swiss! (Friday July 3 2015)

Two Out: Loads To Go! (Thursday July 2 2015)

Where Are They Now? (Thursday July 2 2015)

Holtby Deal Confirmed! (Wednesday July 1 2015)

Archived Spurs Articles

List All Vital Spurs Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Premier League Network Sites

Vital Members League (view all)

1. Topspur1 84
2. Highgatespur 71
3. Pollo 53
4. Spursex 50
5. Real Deal 48
6. MAN ON! 44
7. TH4Life 31
8. a.k.a.james1spurs 29
9. Spurfect11 25
10. Geofspurs 24

League Results (view all)

Latest Results

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
11. Newcastle 0 0 0 0 0 0
12. Norwich 0 0 0 0 0 0
13. Southampton 0 0 0 0 0 0
14. Spurs 0 0 0 0 0 0
15. Stoke 0 0 0 0 0 0
16. Sunderland 0 0 0 0 0 0
17. Swansea 0 0 0 0 0 0

Spurs Fixtures (view all)

Breaking League News

The Battle For Brady
Norwich : 08/07/2015 07:00:01
Al-Habsi could replace outgoing Begovic
Stoke : 07/07/2015 22:07:01
Pieters to miss Barclays Asia Trophy
Stoke : 07/07/2015 21:54:00
Gorre Wants Den Haag Loan To Help Develop Career
Swansea : 07/07/2015 20:55:00
Is the End Really Nigh?
Man Utd : 07/07/2015 19:43:01

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Benteke; Yes or No?
Suggested By:  Vital Spurs
Yes, but he's only worth 15-20m 27%
Yes, but he's only worth 20-25m 12%
Yes, and I would pay his release clause if require 2%
Not for me! 59%